
Considerably less study has been devoted to an understanding of how and on what timescale energy is transferred amongst the ring modes. Such low frequency modes dominate the vibrational state density and play a role in the irreversible nature of the decay out of C-H modes. Recent experimental evidence obtained by Nicholson and Lawrance [6] has indicated that IVR amongst the ring modes is relatively slow. Indeed, analysis of high-resolution dispersed fluorescence spectra suggests that IVR amongst the ring modes in S0 benzene up to 8200 cm-1 is much slower than that involving the excited C-H overtones. The instrument limited linewidths of 1.0-1.3 cm-1 were consistent with an IVR contribution of 0.5 cm-1 and indicate that the IVR rate has an upper limit of 0.094 ps-1 (IVR lifetime > 11 ps) [6].
The aim of the present study is to determine whether
this experimental behaviour can be modelled by classical trajectory methods. The
computational methods employed are briefly outlined in the
next section,
typical results are presented in section 3 and conclusions
are
summarised in section 4.
Index
2. Computational Methods
"the dominant potential coupling is C-H <-> C-H potential coupling which includes diagonal anharmonicity and also anharmonic coupling between the C-H stretch normal modes to produce C-H stretch local modes. This accounts for over 80% of the potential coupling."Thus, such additional higher order potential couplings are likely to be small and are unlikely to play a significant role in the nature of the IVR involving the ring modes. This assumption will be tested in future studies.
The normal mode frequencies for the present model are compared with those of ab initio calculations, experiment and an earlier planar model in Table 1. The overall agreement is reasonable, with some overprediction of the C-H stretching frequencies but the ring mode frequencies, which are the primary focus of the present study, are well reproduced.
,
and
in Figs. 3,
4 and 5,
respectively.
In Figs. 3 and 4, a rapid initial (subpicosecond up to picosecond) decay of energy out of the normal mode corresponding to mode 6 is followed by a much slower decay (on the timescale of many picoseconds). The primary source of the initial fast decay is shown in Fig. 5. There is an accidental Fermi resonance of mode 1 and mode 6 with mode 8 (1602 cm-1). As energy drains from the initially excited mode 1 and mode 6 it enters mode 8 on a timescale of about a picosecond and then is transferred to other modes. On a much longer timescale, some of the remaining energy in mode 1 and mode 6 is transferred to other much more weakly coupled modes.
The timescale for the decay of energy out of the initially excited ring mode state is given in Table 2. For excitations in mode 1 of 2 up to 10 quanta, the initially rapid decay associated with the accidental Fermi resonance occurs on a timescale ranging from 2 ps down to 0.7 ps. The subsequent decay out of mode 6 (or mode 1), is much slower and occurs on a timescale ranging from 34 to 57 ps. This prediction of slow IVR is consistent with the results of the experimental study [6] which yield an upper bound on the irreversible IVR rate constant of 0.094 ps-1 (or a decay time of greater than 11 ps).
The current observations that IVR involving the ring modes of benzene is much slower than IVR out of the C-H overtones are consistent with a previous theoretical study [10] on the relaxation of excited normal modes of benzene. It concluded that the relaxation of the excited modes was incomplete on a timescale of 1 ps. Our findings are also consistent with the idea of that IVR occurs on a sequence of different timescales [1,7,11], reflecting the hierarchy from strong through to weaker mode-mode couplings present in benzene and in many other polyatomic systems. The fact that IVR may not be globally rapid throughout the energetically accessible phase space of a polyatomic reactant molecule has important ramifications for the validity of statistical theories of unimolecular reaction [19-21].
It has been argued [12] that zero point energy should be left out of the other modes to get accurate agreement with the experimental overtone linewidth for IVR in benzene. However, using this approach the agreement between corresponding classical and quantum simulations (e.g. for CH3OOCH3 in [27,28]) would be extremely poor as the classical IVR would be much too slow (since important coupling terms would be inactive or much less effective). Nevertheless it is possible that the nonconservation of zero point energy can lead to some problems with classical simulations causing disagreement with quantum studies [7].
In the present study, the only modes suffering from a nonconservation of zero point energy were the six high frequency C-H stretching modes which were initialised with just their zero point energy. On a timescale of about 0.1 ps, about 250 cm-1 of zero point energy was lost per C-H stretching mode. On a longer timescale of about 10 ps a further 250 cm-1 of zero point energy was lost, leading to an overall loss of about 1/3 of the C-H stretching mode zero-point energy. To test whether this leakage of zero-point energy into the other modes could be avoided, further trajectory calculations were performed with with zero energy in each of the C-H stretching modes and the same ring mode excitations described above. As a result, energy was drained from modes coupled to the C-H stretches (e.g. mode 8) leading to further zero-point energy violations. While the loss of energy from the excited ring modes was only slightly slowed, significantly less energy flowed to some of the other vibrational modes. Thus, leaving out zero-point energy for the C-H stretchinq modes leads to much less efficient IVR than in the calculations presented above which include all of the zero-point energy.
For the present study, the focus is on IVR in ring modes of benzene and our
results show that IVR is extremely slow (on the timescale of many picoseconds)
compared with IVR out of the C-H overtones, consistent semi-quantitatively
with experimental results [6].
Leaving out the zero point energy assigned to the other normal modes
would most likely slow the IVR further. The trajectories would still be
consistent with the experiments [6]
which yield an upper bound on the IVR rate (the linewidths
are instrument limited). However, the author feels that leaving out the zero
point energy entirely is a worse approximation than including all of it.
A more sophisticated approach would be to adopt one of the zero point energy
constraint procedures [22,23]
but they have been known to lead to unphysical behaviour in
certain cases [24].
The zero point energy problem, fortunately, does not directly impact the aim of
the present study which is to show that a simple model can indeed demonstrate
slow IVR amongst the ring modes on a timescale consistent with the
experimental results.
Index
4. Conclusions
Classical trajectory calculations on a full-dimensional model
of benzene, indicate that, whereas IVR out of excited C-H overtones is on a
subpicosecond timescale, IVR involving the ring modes is on a considerably
slower timescale, involving many picoseconds (more than 34 ps).
These results are consistent with lifetimes extracted from high-resolution dispersed fluorescence spectra obtained in recent experimental investigations [6] of IVR in the ring modes of benzene. These experiments suggest a lower limit on the IVR lifetime of 11 ps.
Further calculations are proposed on a more sophisticated model
incorporating higher order potential couplings to determine their effect
on the IVR lifetimes. What the effect will be is unclear at this stage, as the
high order potential couplings are both small and numerous [17] and
potential coupling can either reinforce or oppose the existing largely kinematic
coupling.
Index
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges illuminating discussions with Dr. Warren
Lawrance and
Dr. Michael Collins and financial support from the Australian Research Council.
Index
References
[1] K. V. Reddy, D. F. Heller and M. J. Berry,
J. Chem. Phys. 76 (1982) 2814;
J. W. Perry and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 80 (1984) 5333.
[2] L. Goodman, A. G. Ozkabab, and S. N. Thakur, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 9044.
[3] G. Fischer and A. E. W. Knight, Chem. Phys. 168 (1992) 211.
[4] N. T. Whetton and W. D. Lawrance, Chem. Phys. Lett. 188 (1992) 67.
[5] J. A. Nicholson and W. D. Lawrance, Chem. Phys. 175 (1993) 369.
[6]
J. A. Nicholson and W. D. Lawrance,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 236 (1995) 336.
(Based on the experimental estimate of the linewidth,
the lifetimes and rate constants obtained in this article are
in error by a factor of two and have been corrected in the present paper).
[7] E. L. Sibert III, W. P. Reinhardt and J. T. Hynes, J. Chem. Phys. 81 (1984) 1115.
[8] D. L. Clarke and M. A. Collins, J. Chem. Phys. 86 (1987) 6871; J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 5312.
[9] K. L. Bintz, D. L. Thompson and J. W. Brady, J. Chem. Phys. 85 (1986) 1848; J. Chem. Phys. 86 (1987) 4411.
[10] Y. Guan and D. L. Thompson, J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1987) 2355.
[11] D.-h. Lu and W. L. Hase, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 3217; J. Chem. Phys. 89 (1988) 6723; J. Chem. Phys. 91 (1989) 7490.
[12] J. M. G. Llorente, O. Hahn, and H. S. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990) 2762.
[13] R. E. Wyatt and C. Iung, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 3577.
[14] G. S. Ezra, in Advances in Classical Trajectory Methods, edited by W. L. Hase (JAI Press, New York, 1992), Vol. 1, p. 1.
[15] P. Pulay, G. Fogarasi, and J. E. Boggs, J. Chem. Phys. 74 (1981) 3999.
[16] N. C. Handy, P. E. Maslen, R. D. Amos, J. S. Andrews, C. W. Murray, and G. J. Laming, Chem. Phys. Lett. 197 (1992) 506.
[17] P. E. Maslen, N. C. Handy, R. D. Amos, and D. Jayatilaka, J. Chem. Phys. 97 (1992) 4233.
[18] M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).
[19] H. W. Schranz, L. M. Raff, and D. L. Thompson, J. Chem. Phys. 94 (1991) 4219; 95 (1991) 106; Chem. Phys. Lett. 182 (1991) 455.
[20] T. D. Sewell, H. W. Schranz, D. L. Thompson, and L. M. Raff, J. Chem. Phys. 95 (1991) 8089.
[21] H. W. Schranz, T. D. Sewell and S. Nordholm, in Proceedings of Femtochemistry: The Lausanne Conference, 1995; T. D. Sewell, H. W. Schranz and S. Nordholm, in preparation.
[22] W. H. Miller, W. L. Hase, and C. L. Darling, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2863 (1989).
[23] J. M. Bowman, B. Gazdy, and Q. Sun, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2859 (1989).
[24] T. D. Sewell, D. L. Thompson, J. D. Gezelter, and W. H. Miller, Chem. Phys. Lett. 193, 512 (1991).
[25] R. Alimi, A. Garcia-Vela, and R. B. Gerber, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 2034 (1992).
[26] G. H. Peslherbe and W. L. Hase, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 1179 (1994).
[27] M. A. Collins and H. W. Schranz J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2089 (1994).
[28] H. W. Schranz and M. A. Collins, Intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution and torsional isomerization: a model classical and quantum study, in Proceedings of the First Electronic Computational Chemistry Conference, ( ARInternet , Landover MD, 1995).
[29]
E. L. Sibert III , J. T. Hynes, and W. P. Reinhardt, J. Chem. Phys.
81, 1135 (1984).
Index